ZANETTI v. BONNIEHON

Page 1 of 3

This is a story of two women, who have stood the test of adversity coming from their landlord.

It is a story of courage, especially because Vancouver, British Columbia Canada, is a provincial town that favours landlords, amongst other pwerful groups.

It is also a province wherein white collar crime thrives more in British Columbia than anywhere else in the country, as the likes of Martin Chambers and James Blair Down, to name a few, have been supported in Canada by the authorities, all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada.

Thus it is no wonder as to why Paul H. Cody came to live in Vancouver, British Columbia.

Tina Zanetti & Gina Zanetti “the Zanetti sisters” living at 1395 Beach Avenue, in the City of Vancouver, where they have been residing since year 1986, fought fervently for their home since year 2000, when Paul H. Cody, a slum landlord, who posed as a resident manager of the Surfside Apartments at 1395 Beach Avenue, worth in excess of 20 million dollars or more, went after them, by concocting false allegations, and by vilifying them, for the purpose of eviction.

The allegation, amongst others, was the sisters were on the roof deck of 1395 Beach Avenue, allegedly throwing rocks at Paul H. Cody and his assistant Andrew James Baillargeon, also known as Andrew James, while both men were allegedly sitting on their “chaise lounge” around the outside swimming pool.

The matter was brought before the rentals’ board and after both sides were heard, the sisters resisted eviction.

The following includes Cody's outrageous conduct towards both the sisters on a continuous basis, which falls under criminal harassment :

• Ease dropping at the sisters’ door;

• Slipping letters under the sisters doors;

• Trying to come in the apartment without giving the sisters a 24 hour notice;

• Bullying both the sisters separately;

• Stalking the sisters on a continuous basis by following them around the community;

• In year 2001, closure of the roof deck permanently only for the sisters, but allowing a few other tenants to utilize the facility;

• Locking the sisters in the pool area on Easter Sunday in year 2001, wherein one of the sisters injured herself;

• Getting tenants at the property to sign a petition against the sisters in order to reduce damages at arbitration;

The cause of the petition was due to the sisters second action against Cody at the rentalsboard asking for an order to reinstate the roof as an essential service and for damages. The gist of the petition was that:

the sisters were undemocratic and unfair for wanting the facility of the roof reinstated for all tenants at the property. Cody wrote on the petition that the sisters were imposing their will and demands on the overwhelming majority of residents resulting in undue stress and a general unhappy feeling in the building.

Now, 90 out of 115 in residence allegedly signed the landlord’s petition. (80% of the tenants who found out about the nature of the petition, later moved out)

The significance of someone like Cody and others who helped in getting signatures against the sisters, is great since the power of one man, just like Hitler and others like Hitler, can mean death at the end.

Many tenants claimed they were misled by Cody in signing the Petition however those tenants who make claim they were deceived are not accountable for their actions and as result it begs the question as to who is more dangerous? Those like Hitler or those who opened the ovens for Hitler?

The most outrageous thing Cody did, besides accusing the sisters of something they never had done, is the evileness behind the petition, wherein he was able to obtain as much signatures as he wanted.

This alone shows not the sign of a leader in as much as madman on a mission, especially since it was done without effort by getting adults to sign anything without questioning authority.

The exercise of Cody, having so many people signed a petition has shown one more time on how people are very stupid and this is one thing people like Cody bank on.

--------------------------------------------

The following further demonstrates how much Cody is very familiar with criminal conduct:

Donald Croker, former resident manager, still working for Cody off record, was issued in the summer of 2001, a Subpoena, for the purpose of examination, regarding the roof deck.

It was confirmed by the rentalsboard office that Croker's Subpoena was mailed out and delivered at the sisters address of delivery on the Friday, prior to Croker moving out.

On the weekend, with the help of Neil Croker and Cody, Donald Croker moved out of the building.

After the weekend, on the following Monday, the mailman delivered only two pieces of mail in the Zanettis mailbox.

Later, in the afternoon, it was confirmed that Cody and company had gone in the sisters mailbox, by including Croker's Subpoena, which Cody had removed on the Friday. (Paul H. Cody, holds tenants' mail box keys for no other reason but to snoop and to steal identity from foreign students);

Due to Croker's sudden moving out and the tampering of the mail, the sisters later asked the arbitrator to issue a substitute service under the son’s name.

A letter written by Paul H. Cody and signed by Neil Croker, was later faxed to the arbitrator's rental boards office, alleging that Donald Croker had broken his hip and skull and therefore needed to extort $350.00 for transportation from his new home in White Rock to downtown Vancouver for the hearing.

The sisters did not comply with Croker's demand, rather Croker was warned that if he did not show up at the rentalsboard office, the sisters were prepared to file a an application at the Supreme Court of BC for contempt.

Croker did attend the hearing, and predictably Croker lied under oath for his boss who has been feeding him since year 1991.

The Arbitrator concluded that the sisters were entitled to compensation for the loss of the facility and in the event the landlord would continue providing the roof deck to other tenants and deny the sisters of same, they were entitled to make another application at the rentals board.

Later a private information was laid before a Justice of the Peace against both the Crokers’ and process was issued for attempting to defraud the sisters of money under false pretence.

On February 12, 02, a demand letter was delivered to the landlord summarizing their bad conduct towards the sisters and asking Paul H. Cody mainly to cease and desist his bullying.

The sisters advised the landlord in the demand letter that if Cody decided to not respond to their simple and reasonable demand, the sisters would consider taking legal action against them at the Supreme Court of B.C. for security purpose.

Cody and company did not reply to the demand letter.

Thus a B.C. Supreme Court action was started against Paul H. Cody and two of his corporations and against Andrew James Baillargeon.

For the last 21 years, living at 1395 beach Avenue, all that Cody has to show for is allegedly a visitor's Visa, wherein he can only live in Canada part of the year, yet this American visitor, who lived permanently at the property at 1395 beach Avenue from 1987 to 2005, has given himself the permission to evict law abiding Canadians out of their home when he is tresspassing on Canadian soil.

More